RetroSearch Browse

Sat Mar 6 16:35:53 CET 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-March/098229.html

On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:

> You may want to consider providing global thread and process executors
> in the futures module itself. Code which just wants to say "do this in
> the background" without having to manage the lifecycle of its own
> executor instance is then free to do so.

+1
--
Daniel Stutzbach, Ph.D.
President, Stutzbach Enterprises, LLC <http://stutzbachenterprises.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100306/14947a56/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-March/098229.html below:

[Python-Dev] [PEP 3148] futures - execute computations asynchronously