RetroSearch Browse

Sat Mar 6 10:37:16 CET 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-March/098222.html

On 6 Mar 2010, at 08:42, Jesse Noller wrote:
> If people agree with this; do you feel the proposal of said namespace
> should be a separate PEP, or piggy back on this? I don't want to piggy
> back on Brian's hard work.

It doesn't really matter to me.

We can either update this PEP to propose the concurrent.futures name  
or you can draft a more complete PEP that describes what other  
functionality should live in the concurrent package.

Cheers,
Brian

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-March/098222.html below:

[Python-Dev] [PEP 3148] futures - execute computations asynchronously