On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Jesse Noller <jnoller at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Daniel Stutzbach > <daniel at stutzbachenterprises.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Brian Quinlan <brian at sweetapp.com> wrote: > >> > >> import futures > > > > +1 on the idea, -1 on the name. It's too similar to "from __future__ import > > ...". > > Futures is a common term for this, and implemented named this in other > languages. I don't think we should be adopting things that are common, > and found elsewhere and then renaming them. Another common term for this is a "promise". -- Curt Hagenlocher curt at hagenlocher.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4