On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 13:56, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote: > 2010/3/4 Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan at ochtman.nl>: > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 22:44, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> > wrote: > >> +1 to bringing back affected files. It helps tell at a glance whether > >> a changeset is interesting or not. > > > > Do they need to be in the subject, or would it be fine to have them in > > the message? > > Both is good actually. > I prefer the subject so that I can easily skim them to see if someone edited a file I really care about, but if that is not possible then the body is acceptable, especially if it is the first thing in the body (that would let me at least see some of it in the initial snippet Gmail shows). -Brett > > > -- > Regards, > Benjamin > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100304/6ed766dc/attachment-0001.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4