Henning von Bargen wrote: > If the ZIP contains only bytecode files, it is just not intended > for changing any code, so I don't think this is an argument. > If you have access to the source code, you still can use that instead > of messing around with byte code. That doesn't apply when it is the app developer trying to figure out why their app is breaking when they throw it in a bytecode only zip :) It's a moot point anyway - Guido has pronounced that the bytecode-only support will be left alone by PEP 3147 even if the other caching changes are eventually accepted. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ---------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4