Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-March/098145.html below:

[Python-Dev] __file__ and bytecode-only

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] __file__ and bytecode-only
• Next message: [Python-Dev] __file__ and bytecode-only
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Le Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:22:13 +1300,
Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> a écrit :

> Glenn Linderman wrote:
> 
> > In this scenario, the .pyc files would still live in __pycache__ ?  
> > Complete with the foo.<token>.pyc naming ?
> 
> It might be neater to have a separate cache directory
> for each bytecode version, named __cache.<token>__ or
> some such.
> 

Actually, I find it neater to have a single cache directory. It makes
for much less clutter, and simpler ignore rules.

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] __file__ and bytecode-only
• Next message: [Python-Dev] __file__ and bytecode-only
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4