A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-March/098144.html below:

[Python-Dev] __file__ and bytecode-only

[Python-Dev] __file__ and bytecode-only [Python-Dev] __file__ and bytecode-onlyAntoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Thu Mar 4 04:31:15 CET 2010 
Le Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:51:04 -0800,
Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> a écrit :
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 16:37, Jim Jewett <jimjjewett at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > I understand the need to ship without source -- but why does that
> > require supporting .pyc (or .pyo) -only?
> >
> > Couldn't vendors just replace the real .py files with empty files?
> >
> 
> Because if someone screws up the mod time on the source files
> the .pyc files will get recreated silently.

Unless the .py files arrange to raise a syntax error on compiling.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4