On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > On Mar 02, 2010, at 09:34 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > >>On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: >>> P.S. I actually started this thread as a +0 to the idea of dropping >>> bytecode only imports. Over the course of the discussion I've shifted to >>> a firm -1 in the absence of some proper comparative benchmarks to >>> justify the change in semantics. >> >>FWIW, I started at -1 and am still -1. I think the PEP is overreaching >>in this aspect; it does not serve the stated purpose of the PEP to >>make life easier for distros that share code between Python versions. > > I think that's fair, and just the guidance I'm looking for. By now you > understand the pros and cons, so if this is a pronouncement, I will cement it > into the PEP. Yes, and thanks! -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4