On Mar 02, 2010, at 09:34 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote: >On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: >> P.S. I actually started this thread as a +0 to the idea of dropping >> bytecode only imports. Over the course of the discussion I've shifted to >> a firm -1 in the absence of some proper comparative benchmarks to >> justify the change in semantics. > >FWIW, I started at -1 and am still -1. I think the PEP is overreaching >in this aspect; it does not serve the stated purpose of the PEP to >make life easier for distros that share code between Python versions. I think that's fair, and just the guidance I'm looking for. By now you understand the pros and cons, so if this is a pronouncement, I will cement it into the PEP. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100302/f740fd0e/attachment.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4