A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-March/098066.html below:

[Python-Dev] __file__

[Python-Dev] __file__ [Python-Dev] __file__Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Mon Mar 1 15:21:21 CET 2010
Le Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:09:09 +0100,
Baptiste Carvello <baptiste13z at free.fr> a écrit :
> 
> I did a quick check on the stdlib: a zip with .py and .pyc is about
> 80% bigger than one with .pyc only. If you use only the bytecode,
> this can be seen as waisted space. On the other hand, if you ever
> need to debug the application, source is very handy...

My point is that the wasted size compared to the total bundle size
(with interpreter and 3rd party C libs) would probably be small.

> Anyway, I'm a bit worried if bytecode-only is disabled from zipimport
> without some input from the developpers of py2exe/cx_freeze/etc, as
> they are big users of it.

Granted.

Regards

Antoine.


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4