On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 08:28:45PM +1200, Greg Ewing wrote: > A thought on this poly_str type: perhaps it could be > called "ascii", since that's what it would have to be > restricted to, and have > > a'xxx' > > as a literal syntax for it, seeing as literals seem to > be one of its main use cases. This seems like a good idea. > > Thinking way outside the square, and probably the pale > as well, maybe @ could be pressed into service as an > infix operator, with > > s at i > > being equivalent to > > s[i:i+1] > And this is way beyond being intuitive. -- Senthil
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4