Am 25.06.2010 01:28, schrieb Stephen Thorne: > Steve Holden Wrote: >> Given the amount of interest this thread has generated I can't help >> wondering why it isn't more prominent in python.org content. Is the >> developer community completely disjoint with the web content editor >> community? >> >> If there is such a disconnect we should think about remedying it: a >> large "Python 2 or 3?" button could link to a reasoned discussion of the >> pros and cons as evinced in this thread. That way people will end up >> with the right version more often (and be writing Python 2 that will >> more easily migrate to Python 3, if they cannot yet use 3). >> >> There seems to be a perception that the PSF can help fund developments, >> and indeed Jesse Noller has made a small start with his sprint funding >> proposal (which now has some funding behind it). I think if it is to do >> so the Foundation will have to look for substantial new funding. I do >> not currently understand where this funding would come from, and would >> like to tap your developer creativity in helping to define how the >> Foundation can effectively commit more developer time to Python. >> >> GSoC and GHOP are great examples, but there is plenty of room for all >> sorts of initiatives that result in development opportunities. I'd like >> to help. > > I am extremely keen for this to happen. Does anyone have ownership of this > project? There was some discussion of it up-list but the discussion fizzled. Can you please explain what "this project" is, in the context of your message? GSoC? GHOP? Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4