On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > Please let me know what you think. I'm happy to just commit this to the py3k > branch if there are no objections <wink>. I don't think a new PEP is in > order, but an update to PEP 3147 might make sense. I like the idea, but I think summarising the rest of this discussion in its own (relatively short) PEP would be good (there are a few things that are tricky - exact versioning scheme, PEP 384 forward compatibility, impact on distutils, articulating the benefits for distro packaging, etc). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4