A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-June/100893.html below:

email package status in 3.X]

[Python-Dev] [OT] glyphs [was Re: email package status in 3.X] [Python-Dev] [OT] glyphs [was Re: email package status in 3.X]Steven D'Aprano steve at pearwood.info
Tue Jun 22 12:52:39 CEST 2010
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:46:27 am Terry Reedy wrote:
> 3. Unicode disclaims direct representation of glyphic variants
> (though again, exceptions were made for asian acceptance). For
> example, in English, mechanically printed 'a' and 'g' are different
> from manually printed 'a' and 'g'. Representing both by the same
> codepoint, in itself, loses information. One who wishes to preserve
> the distinction must instead use a font tag or perhaps a
> <handprinted> tag. Similarly, older English had a significantly
> different glyph for 's', which looks more like a modern 'f'.

An unfortunate example, as the old English long-s gets its own Unicode 
codepoint.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_s


-- 
Steven D'Aprano
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4