2010/6/20 Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net>: > On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 14:40:56 -0400 > "P.J. Eby" <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote: >> >> Actually, I would say that it's more that (in the network protocol >> case) we *have* bytes, some of which we would like to *treat* as >> text, yet do not wish to constantly convert back and forth to >> full-blown unicode > > Well, then why don't you just stick with a bytes object? There are not many tools for treating bytes as text. -- Regards, Benjamin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4