On 01:09 pm, arcriley at gmail.com wrote: >[snip] >It is not "critical self-evaluation" to repeat "Python 3 is not ready" >as >litany in #Python and your supporting website. I use the word "litany" >here >because #Python refers users to what appears to be a religious website >http://python-commandments.org/python3.html It's not my website. I don't own the domain, I don't control the hosting, I didn't generate the content, I have no access to change anything on it. I've barely even frequent #python in the last three years. Perhaps you were directing those comments at Stephen Thorne though (although I don't know if he's any more involved in it than I am so don't take this as anything but idle speculation). >I have further witnessed (and even been the other party to) you and >other >ops in #Python telling package developers, who have clearly said that >they >are working to port their legacy package to Py3, that "Python 3 is not >ready". I'm not going to condone or condemn events which I didn't observe. However you've never witnessed me discouraging developers who were actively porting software to Python 3 because I've never done it. I'm sure this was an honest mistake and you simply confused me with someone else. >Besides rally against it what have you, as a Twisted developer, done >regarding the Python 3 migration process? This, however, I find extremely insulting. I don't answer to you. The only reason I'm replying at all is to correct the two pieces of misinformation in your message. I don't see how this discussion can go anywhere productive, so I'll do my best to make this my last post on the subject. Obviously I made a mistake posting to the thread at all. Jean-Paul
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4