RetroSearch Browse

Sat Jun 19 15:23:25 CEST 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-June/100655.html

Am 19.06.2010 15:05, schrieb James Mills:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Antoine Pitrou<solipsis at pitrou.net>  wrote:
>> I should point out that I am in no way responsible for the migration.
>> I think Dirkjan and Brett said they would tackle this after the 2.7
>> release. But they'd better answer by themselves :)
>
> I'm willing to help out if needed. Can't hurt to have
> another set of hands :) I'm sure there are others in the
> Mercurial/Python community that would be willing to help too!

Take a look at

http://hg.python.org/pymigr/

What I *think* is missing is all the hook scripts (but you would need to 
check with Dirkjan whether they are already somewhere).

In theory, I would expect that you can run this migration suite 
yourself, and get a working installation - but I never tried myself.

See also PEP 385, which is the master plan. I'm not sure whether the
approach to branches has been approved (or who could really approve it);
I just notice that the current conversion produces a ridiculously large
repository (which fails to download with older versions of hg because
of size).

On the meta level, what seems to be missing as well is a clear view on
what the status is - so if you manage to get it working somehow, don't
forget to post what you think the status is.

Regards,
Martin

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-June/100655.html below:

[Python-Dev] Mercurial