Michael Foord: > Python 3.0 was *declared* to be an experimental release, and by most > standards 3.1 (in terms of the core language and functionality) was a solid > release. That looks to me like an after-the-event rationalization. The release note for Python 3.0 (and the "What's new") gives no indication that it is experimental but does say """ We are confident that Python 3.0 is of the same high quality as our previous releases ... you can safely choose either version (or both) to use in your projects. """ http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-December/083824.html Neil
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4