On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:09 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: .. > So it's clearly intentional. I doubt its desirable, though. If only > __PyTime_DoubleToTimet needs to be duplicated, I'd rather put that > function into a separate C file that gets included twice, instead of > including the full timemodule.c into datetimemodule.c. Thanks for your research, Martin. I've opened an issue for this at http://bugs.python.org/issue9012 .
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4