Le mercredi 09 juin 2010 10:41:29, M.-A. Lemburg a écrit : > No, .transform() and .untransform() will be interface to same-type > codecs, i.e. ones that convert bytes to bytes or str to str. As with > .encode()/.decode() these helper methods also implement type safety > of the return type. What about buffer compatible objects like array.array(), memoryview(), etc.? Should we use codecs.encode() / codecs.decode() for these types? -- Victor Stinner http://www.haypocalc.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4