On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Alexander Belopolsky <alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > .. >> That said, I really don't think catching such a rare error is worth >> *any* runtime overhead. Just making "__main__" and the real module >> name refer to the same object in sys.modules is a different matter, >> but I'm not confident enough that I fully grasp the implications to do >> it without gathering feedback from a wider audience. > > If you make sys.module['__main__'] and sys.module['modname'] the same > (let's call it mod), what will be the value of mod.__name__? "__main__", so pickling would remain broken. unpickling would at least work correctly under this regime though. The only way to fix pickling is to avoid monkeying with __name__ at all (e.g. something along the lines of PEP 299, or a special "__is_main__" flag). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4