On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > On Jul 30, 2010, at 01:42 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > >>Well it is a reserved name so those packages that were setting it >>should have known that they were using undefined behavior that could >>change at any time. > > Shouldn't it be described here then? > > http://docs.python.org/reference/lexical_analysis.html#identifiers No, since it is covered here: http://docs.python.org/reference/lexical_analysis.html#reserved-classes-of-identifiers -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4