RetroSearch Browse

Tue Jul 27 13:11:48 CEST 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-July/102452.html

Am 27.07.2010 10:54, schrieb David:
>     I'd welcome any patch submitted to Rietveld for review.  However, your
> 
>     proposed "review.py" module does not exist as far as I know, and unless
>     someone writes it, it won't.
> 
> 
> Haven't personally tested that it works with Rietveld due to lack of patches
> sitting around, but cursory investigation suggests that reports of non-existence
> may have been exaggerated ;)
> 
> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/review/r537

Ah!  Well, a link to this instead of tirades would have been helpful from
the OP; now at least we know what he's talking about.

Georg

-- 
Thus spake the Lord: Thou shalt indent with four spaces. No more, no less.
Four shall be the number of spaces thou shalt indent, and the number of thy
indenting shall be four. Eight shalt thou not indent, nor either indent thou
two, excepting that thou then proceed to four. Tabs are right out.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-July/102452.html below:

[Python-Dev] Define a place for code review in Python workflow