On 7/27/2010 11:02 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:57:22 +0200 > Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote: > >> Am 27.07.2010 04:43, schrieb Terry Reedy: >>> On 7/26/2010 5:15 PM, Georg Brandl wrote: >>> >>>> Sure PyPI is part of the ecosystem. But so are quite a lot of other tools, >>>> and none of them are tracked in bugs.python.org. (This is also the case >>>> for the website.) I'd really like bugs.python.org to remain a tracker for >>>> what we ship as the CPython distribution, and nothing else. There's enough >>>> content in there already. >>> >>> How about one other tracker, say bugs.python/org/tools (or projects, or >>> ???) for everything else: pypi, distribute2 (until part of release), web >>> site, sandbox projects? It would have to be taught how to turn revxxxx + >>> component into a link to the appropriate repository. >> >> I still think that one tracker per project/site is the better way. > > Only if they have similar look and feel, and don't require you to > register the same login N times, though. > Is it really time to give devs a distributed identity good for a range of systems? Sounds like a potentially hairy management task. regards Steve -- Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 DjangoCon US September 7-9, 2010 http://djangocon.us/ See Python Video! http://python.mirocommunity.org/ Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4