On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:57:22 +0200 Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote: > Am 27.07.2010 04:43, schrieb Terry Reedy: > > On 7/26/2010 5:15 PM, Georg Brandl wrote: > > > >> Sure PyPI is part of the ecosystem. But so are quite a lot of other tools, > >> and none of them are tracked in bugs.python.org. (This is also the case > >> for the website.) I'd really like bugs.python.org to remain a tracker for > >> what we ship as the CPython distribution, and nothing else. There's enough > >> content in there already. > > > > How about one other tracker, say bugs.python/org/tools (or projects, or > > ???) for everything else: pypi, distribute2 (until part of release), web > > site, sandbox projects? It would have to be taught how to turn revxxxx + > > component into a link to the appropriate repository. > > I still think that one tracker per project/site is the better way. Only if they have similar look and feel, and don't require you to register the same login N times, though. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4