A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-July/102411.html below:

[Python-Dev] Define a place for code review in Python workflow

[Python-Dev] Define a place for code review in Python workflow [Python-Dev] Define a place for code review in Python workflowR. David Murray rdmurray at bitdance.com
Mon Jul 26 22:38:50 CEST 2010
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:18:05 +0300, anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com> wrote:
> > python -m review
> 
> and allows you to:
> 
> 1. Create issue for patch review on Rietveld site
> 2. Run "svn diff"
> 3. Upload the patch
> 4. Supply comment for the patch
> 
> everything above in one step. To upload an updated patch, you just do:
> 
> > python -m review -i XXXXX -m "log of fixes made in comparison with previous patch"
> 
> Everybody can go to Rietveld site to view either patch or the whole
> file code _with_ the patch. Everybody can add comments _directly_ near
> patch lines.
> Everybody receives notifications about new code review comments.

We do use rietveld for reviews, though (so far) not usually for
small patches.  That could change.

So:

1) write the tool
2) upload it to pypi
3) see to what extent it gets adopted.

There's nothing in your proposal that is outside of your control,
as far as I can tell.

(Well, except for easy_install not being in the stdlib, but that's
no barrier to adoption of the proposed tool.)

--
R. David Murray                                      www.bitdance.com
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4