RetroSearch Browse

Sun Jul 25 20:53:48 CEST 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-July/102348.html

On Jul 25, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Michael Foord wrote:

> On 25/07/2010 19:34, Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
>> [snip...]
>>> On the other hand, posting actual patches that fix actual bugs can
>>> make a lot of a difference. Also, having a maintainer who is willing
>>> to look into these patches and accept the good ones will make a lot
>>> of a difference.
>>>     
>> With respect to the trace module, I started both of these things
>> already, but I would really like to hear feedback from people
>> interested in the future of pdb and profile modules as well.
>>   
> 
> Antonio Cuni demoed some *great* improvements to the pdb module at EuroPython. A project called pdb++
> 
> http://codespeak.net/svn/user/antocuni/hack/pdb.py
> 
> Among its improvements it includes the ability to debug through generator frames, which pdb can't. It would be great to see some of these fixes folded back into the standard library version.
> 

+1

Raymond

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-July/102348.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python profiler and other tools