RetroSearch Browse

Sat Jul 24 00:22:52 CEST 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-July/102289.html

On Jul 23, 2010, at 01:46 PM, schmir at gmail.com wrote:

>Doesn't anybody else think this is lost work for very little gain? My
>/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages directory consumes 200MB on disk. I
>couldn't care less if my /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages consumed the
>same amount of disk space...

Right, you probably don't care now that your extension modules live in foo.so
so it probably won't make much difference if they were named foo-blahblah.so,
as long as they import. :)

If you use Debian or Ubuntu though, it'll be a win for you by allow us to make
Python support much more robust.

-Barry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100724/3e0b109f/attachment.pgp>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-July/102289.html below:

[Python-Dev] versioned .so files for Python 3.2