On Jul 23, 2010, at 11:48 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote: >> I'd be open to adding the >> platform name to the tag, but I'd probably define it as part of the >> implementation field, e.g. foo.cpython-linux2-32m.so. Or maybe >> start with the platform name, e.g. foo.linux2-cpython-32m. This >> isn't a strong preference though. > >I don't have a strong opionion, but placing the platform name at the >start is probably better to be consistent with >sysconfig.get_platform(). What about the architecture (i386, amd64)? With every increase in length I start to get more concerned. We could encode the platform and architecture, but that gets into cryptic territory. OTOH, would you really co-install i386 and amd64 shared libraries on the same machine? (hello NFS ;). -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100723/1b5d700c/attachment.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4