On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 13:00, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:51:57 +0100 > Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: > > > > That's an option. I just remember Tim bringing up something about that > > approach that didn't quite work as a complete replacement for __del__. > > > > Basically the whole setting a module's globals to None was done before gc > > came into the language. Now that it's there it seems that it might work > to > > simply let gc clean up the module itself. > > There is a patch at http://bugs.python.org/issue812369 for GC-based > module shutdown, but it doesn't actually remove the setting of module > globals to None. I think further testing and experimentation would be > required to validate it. > Yep, it was agreed that for this to happen someone would have to write the patch and see what broke. -Brett > > Regards > > Antoine. > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40python.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100723/06110d70/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4