On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote: > Sure -- I don't think this is a showstopper for regex. However if we don't > include regex in a future version, we might think about increasing MAXCACHE > a bit, and maybe not clear the cache when it reaches its max length, but > rather remove another element. Yikes, I didn't know it did that. That certainly sounds like it should be an RFE in its own right - some basic form of Least Recently Used accounting should be beneficial (although the extra bookkeeping might hurt scripts that aren't hitting the cache limit). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4