On 7/20/2010 6:59 AM, Oleg Broytman wrote: > I know, the task of sending answers like I've sent is quite > unappreciated. *I* appreciate it. I mostly do not respond to such because I expect you or Aahz will. > I know, the meaning of my answer is rude because, in short, > it's simply "Please, go away", and however I stress the "please" part it's > still "go away". If I were a help seeker it'd be quite a hard blow for me > to receive such an answer. Yes, I know. 1. I suggested one improvement to the canned response in my previous post: expand 'using' to 'using or understanding'. 2. Here is another: mention that Python developers who are willing to answer non-development questions already participate on python-list/gmane.comp.python.general to answer such questions there. 3. That brings up: also mention gmane.comp.python.general, for those like me who prefer the newsgroup interface. 4. Alexander Belopolsky wrote: "People dislike canned responses no matter how friendly and polite they sound. I believe python-dev tradition is to redirect the poster to python-list but still include at least a hint to what the answer to his or her question is." I believe you *did* do that, but it was easily missed. So: end the boilerplate with ------------------------------------------------------------- and put hints here so they stand out. > Still, two other alternatives are even worse. The first alternative is > to not answer "using" questions at all; quite rude. The second is answer > all questions and make the developers quit the list and found a new quiet > one. I brought up that same possibility. > I don't see any other alternative, do you? Of those three - which one > do you prefer? > The original question was about using python, that's my understanding. I agree that it appeared to be, but it was phrased in terms of understanding its operation, hence the claim that it was not, and hence suggestion 1) above. -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4