On 13/07/2010 15:17, Reid Kleckner wrote: > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Nick Coghlan<ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > >> MRAB's module offers a superset of re's features rather than a subset >> though, so once it has had more of a chance to bake on PyPI it may be >> worth another look. >> > I feel like the new module is designed to replace the current re > module, and shouldn't need to spend time in PyPI. A faster regex > library isn't going to motivate users to add external dependencies to > their projects. > > If the backwards compatibility issues can be addressed and MRAB is willing to remain as maintainer then the advantages seem well worth it to me. Michael > Reid > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk > -- http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4