RetroSearch Browse

Tue Jul 13 13:06:25 CEST 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-July/101879.html

On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 19:08:07 -0400
Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote:
> On 7/12/2010 2:05 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> >> What I specifically want right now is Commit Authorization Privilege,
> >> especially for IDLE,
> >
> > Not sure who could grant that, but as far as I can: you have it.
> 
> If I were approved to commit patches directly, then by implication I 
> should be able to approve others doing the same. That is occasionally 
> done now by others, but I wanted to be clear that for the present, the 
> latter is all I could and would do.

There is no formal approval process. If you post a review of a patch
saying "the patch is ok" and the patch submitter is also a committer,
he can then commit it himself. There is no need for more bureaucracy,
and you don't need commit access to do this.

Regards

Antoine.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-July/101879.html below:

[Python-Dev] Removing IDLE from the standard library