RetroSearch Browse

Tue Jul 13 08:41:31 CEST 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-July/101870.html

Am 13.07.2010 00:48, schrieb Eric Smith:
> On 7/12/2010 6:04 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
>> Given how high traffic python-checkins is I don't consider that a
>> reasonable place to send follow-up and nor do I consider it the
>> responsibility of committers to monitor it. As you said earlier this
>> *isn't* in our standard dev procedures and nor do I think it should be.
>> If you can't find an email address then either python-comitters or
>> python-dev would be a better place to send feedback.
> 
> Maybe reply-to on the checkin messages could be set to python-dev. Not
> sure if that's a mailman feature, though.

Somebody correct me if I'm wrong: I think we had this, at one point,
and then switched it to the status quo. I can surely try switching it
back if desired.

Regards,
Martin

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-July/101870.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Idle-dev] Removing IDLE from the standard library