Neil Hodgson wrote:
> Kurt B. Kaiser:
>
>>> The tear off menus are ugly as well as being non-standard on all three
>>> major platforms.
>> Well, would you discard them? They can (occasionally) be useful.
>
> Yes, I would replace the menus with ones missing the tear line.
> Most of the GUI toolkits experimented with tear-offs (Mac in late 80s,
> GTK+ up until 2002) and dropped them or hid them in a rarely visited
> API. The idea initially appeared reasonable ("I can have the Run and
> Check commands available with a single click") but was found to be too
> confusing in use.
>
> IDLE, because it uses a separate top-level window for each file and
> shell suffers more than most applications. A menu is torn off from one
> window and always applies to that window but shows no visual affinity
> with that window: its window is not even activated when a menu command
> acts on it.
>
I agree, the tear-off menus are an anachronism. I'd also like a pony in
the form of easily-changeable sets of keystroke mappings. I have never
found Alt-P and its cousins either memorable or comfortable.
I won't raise an issue for this. There are enough IDLE tickets without
it :-)
regards
Steve
--
Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119
DjangoCon US September 7-9, 2010 http://djangocon.us/
See Python Video! http://python.mirocommunity.org/
Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4