On 12/07/2010 23:48, Eric Smith wrote: > On 7/12/2010 6:04 PM, Michael Foord wrote: >> Given how high traffic python-checkins is I don't consider that a >> reasonable place to send follow-up and nor do I consider it the >> responsibility of committers to monitor it. As you said earlier this >> *isn't* in our standard dev procedures and nor do I think it should be. >> If you can't find an email address then either python-comitters or >> python-dev would be a better place to send feedback. > > Maybe reply-to on the checkin messages could be set to python-dev. Not > sure if that's a mailman feature, though. I think this would be a good idea. It would be nice to have on-topic traffic here. :-) Michael > > Eric. > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk > -- http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/ http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog READ CAREFULLY. By accepting and reading this email you agree, on behalf of your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use policies (”BOGUS AGREEMENTS”) that I have entered into with your employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4