On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:01:07 am Steve Holden wrote: > My own inclination would be to regard the current treatment of file: > as a bug (albeit one not worth fixing on 2.x). ... > Presumably a > hostname in such a URI would require that some host-specific protocol > be used (but this should be an access protocol like SMB or NFS, not a > transfer protocol like FTP). KDE uses SMB for non-local hostnames in file URIs. > It seems pretty clear that randomly interpreting particular host > names to imply a specific remote-access protocol like FTP is bogus. Agreed. The right behaviour is to raise an exception and let the caller deal with it, or provide a means to register an alternative. -- Steven D'Aprano
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4