A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-July/101724.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Idle-dev] Removing IDLE from the standard library

[Python-Dev] [Idle-dev] Removing IDLE from the standard library [Python-Dev] [Idle-dev] Removing IDLE from the standard library"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Mon Jul 12 00:41:50 CEST 2010
> My point is that I don't think I am exaggerating IDLE's flaws. I'm not
> saying that it is no longer usable or useful, but I am saying that its
> current state is not "okay".

So can you produce a list of patches that you think can be accepted as-is?

Preferably, make to lists: bug fixes, and new features. The bug fixes
could be either for 2.x or 3.x; the new features would preferably be
for just 3.x.

Regards,
Martin
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4