A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-July/101718.html below:

[Python-Dev] Removing IDLE from the standard library

[Python-Dev] Removing IDLE from the standard library [Python-Dev] Removing IDLE from the standard library"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Mon Jul 12 00:28:58 CEST 2010
> I am aware of the situation with regard to issue reviews, but I think
> with IDLE there is more going on. In other parts of the Python
> codebase, a workaround for a major usability issue wouldn't normally
> have taken nearly three years to resolve after a working patch was
> submitted.

Oh sure it does. Just look at all the cross-compilation bug reports and
patches that get submitted.

> And a working, well-tested patch wouldn't normally have sat
> ignored for over two years. Well, perhaps these things happen
> occasionally, but with IDLE this is the norm.

Unfortunately, they happen more often than you think.

Regards,
Martin
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4