RetroSearch Browse

Sun Jul 11 21:47:30 CEST 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-July/101709.html

On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 05:22:28PM +0300, Tal Einat wrote:
> Initially (five years ago!) I tried to overcome these issues by
> improving IDLE, solving problems and adding a few key features.
> Without going into details, suffice to say that IDLE hasn't improved
> much since 2005 despite my efforts. For example, see

Is it maybe time for another idle-fork project to develop IDLE outside
the stdlib for a while, and then the forked version could be swallowed
wholesale by the Python 3.2 release?

--amk

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-July/101709.html below:

[Python-Dev] Removing IDLE from the standard library