A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-July/101681.html below:

[Python-Dev] Removing IDLE from the standard library

[Python-Dev] Removing IDLE from the standard library [Python-Dev] Removing IDLE from the standard libraryAntoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Sun Jul 11 11:12:40 CEST 2010
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 21:33:28 -0400
Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote:
> 
> The problem here, it seems to me, is that all issues are autoassigned to 
> an inactive person (KBK) who does not really accept them except once a 
> year or so. I do not know whether all other commiter are unwilling to 
> commit IDLE issues, no matter how obvious and trivial, or if they all 
> think they 'belong' to KBK.

Well, how can you expect people to commit patches for something
they don't know or use?
(and, admittedly, something many of us don't care about)

Regards

Antoine.


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4