Am 07.07.2010 23:04, schrieb Georg Brandl: > Am 07.07.2010 20:40, schrieb Barry Warsaw: > >> Getting back to this after the US holiday. Thanks for running these numbers >> Scott. I've opened a bug in the Python tracker and attached my latest patch: >> >> http://bugs.python.org/issue9193 >> >> The one difference from previous versions of the patch is that the .so tag is >> now settable via "./configure --with-so-abi-tag=foo". This would generate >> shared libs like _multiprocessing.foo.so. >> >> I'd like to get consensus as to whether folks feel that a PEP is needed. My >> own thought is that I'd rather not do a PEP specific to this change, but I >> would update PEP 384 with the implications on .so versioning. Please also >> feel free to review the patch in that issue. > > I can see where this is going... writing it into PEP 384 would automatically get > the change accepted? I hit "Send" prematurely. I wanted to add that I'd be okay with this change, be it in a new PEP or an old one. Georg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4