On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 13:53, Alexander Belopolsky <alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: > >>>>> 2. There are test classes defined at the test_datetime module level >>>>> that subclass from datetime classes. The self.module is not available >>>>> at the module level. These should probably be moved to setUp() >>>>> methods and attached to test case self. > .. >>> What about #2? > >> Either define two different subclasses or write a function that >> returns the class using the superclass that you want. >> > > Selecting one of two globally defined different subclasses will be > ugly in parameterized tests. Didn't say it was a pretty solution. =) > An in the other approach, the class > definitions will have to be moved away from the module level and > inside a scope where module variable is present. Yep, which is not a big deal. > Yes, it looks like > some refactoring is unavoidable. > =)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4