On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote: > I know, and this is what I originally intended for Sphinx. However, the calls > for automatic doc generation are very loud, and it's understandable that most > project can't afford writing their documentation twice. The ability to provide extended content beyond what's provided in the docstring using the auto* constructs may make it feasible to start avoiding some of those DRY violations for Python's standard library; I'm enjoying those for another project. I hope we don't end up in a position where we can't use the auto* constructs in the Python documentation. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at gmail.com> "A storm broke loose in my mind." --Albert Einstein
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4