A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-July/101539.html below:

docstring formatting in python distutils code

[Python-Dev] query: docstring formatting in python distutils code [Python-Dev] query: docstring formatting in python distutils codeSenthil Kumaran orsenthil at gmail.com
Wed Jul 7 19:36:58 CEST 2010
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote:
> Agreed.  However, reST doesn't need to be less readable if the specific
> inline markup is not used.  For example, using `identifier` to refer to a
> function or *var* to refer to a variable (which is already done at quite a
> few places) is very readable IMO.  Using ``code`` also isn't bad, considering
> that double quotes are not much different and potentially ambiguous.

What are the specific advantages that you see?
Can it more useful in some cases than the other?



-- 
Senthil
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4