On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Alexander Belopolsky <alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com> wrote: > What do you think? Please reply here or add a comment at > http://bugs.python.org/issue7989. (For those that haven't read the tracker discussion, it's long, but worth skimming to get a better idea of the various points of view). +1 on the general idea, but I haven't looked at the patches in order to be able to comment on the specifics (except that following any of the test_warnings, test_heapq, test_pickle, test_io, etc. styles of testing parallel implementations should be fine). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4