On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Ben Finney <ben+python at benfinney.id.au> wrote: > That's the point: selling, and commercial activity in general, is > explicitly encouraged and permission granted by the GPL. Too many people > speak as though it were otherwise. To those who do: Please stop. > Please, GPL advocates also spread their own type of FUD, claiming "free as in speech ain't the same thing as free as in beer, people!". While true, the bottom line is that Python being BSD-type enables me to make money with it that I wouldn't make if Python was GPL-type. Moreover, I don't think that GPL license allows money-making that BSD type wouldn't allow. Hence the common point of view saying "BSD-type is more commercial-friendly than GPL". I've written an article last year that, while it doesn't address this issue specifically, it touches it. http://www.hardcoded.net/articles/going_open_source.htm Virgil Dupras
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4