Am 04.07.2010 00:56, schrieb Antoine Pitrou: > On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 00:51:58 +0200 > "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: >>>>> I'd love to see a more detailed description of this, including why >>>>> someone new to Mercurial would choose one over the other. >>> >>>> I think someone new to Mercurial shouldn't choose either one. >>> >>>> Just sit back and wait for the real migration to happen. >>> >>> I would say that using the SVN mirror is a fine way to experiment with >>> using hg against the Python sources to develop and test patches. >> >> I think your description already falls into the "advanced user" >> category. The new-to-mercurial committer should (IMO) use a "what if it >> still was svn" workflow, which uses hg pull/up/commit/push. > > This assumes they are accustomed to SVN. I guess not all people are, > although it is certainly a common skill. I thought we were talking about Python committers specifically. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4