On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 00:51:58 +0200 "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: > >>> I'd love to see a more detailed description of this, including why > >>> someone new to Mercurial would choose one over the other. > > > >> I think someone new to Mercurial shouldn't choose either one. > > > >> Just sit back and wait for the real migration to happen. > > > > I would say that using the SVN mirror is a fine way to experiment with > > using hg against the Python sources to develop and test patches. > > I think your description already falls into the "advanced user" > category. The new-to-mercurial committer should (IMO) use a "what if it > still was svn" workflow, which uses hg pull/up/commit/push. This assumes they are accustomed to SVN. I guess not all people are, although it is certainly a common skill. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4