A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-July/101418.html below:

[Python-Dev] Mercurial migration readiness

[Python-Dev] Mercurial migration readiness [Python-Dev] Mercurial migration readinessAntoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Sun Jul 4 00:56:27 CEST 2010
On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 00:51:58 +0200
"Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
> >>> I'd love to see a more detailed description of this, including why
> >>> someone new to Mercurial would choose one over the other.
> > 
> >> I think someone new to Mercurial shouldn't choose either one.
> > 
> >> Just sit back and wait for the real migration to happen.
> > 
> > I would say that using the SVN mirror is a fine way to experiment with
> > using hg against the Python sources to develop and test patches. 
> 
> I think your description already falls into the "advanced user"
> category. The new-to-mercurial committer should (IMO) use a "what if it
> still was svn" workflow, which uses hg pull/up/commit/push.

This assumes they are accustomed to SVN. I guess not all people are,
although it is certainly a common skill.

Regards

Antoine.


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4